House debates

Monday, 18 June 2018

Business

Rearrangement

11:59 am

Photo of Mark DreyfusMark Dreyfus (Isaacs, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Attorney General) Share this | | Hansard source

by leave—I move:

That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the member for Isaacs from moving the following motion immediately—that the House resolves that it will never support the privatisation of the ABC and calls on the government to reverse its latest damaging $83 million cut to the ABC.

Photo of Ian GoodenoughIan Goodenough (Moore, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Is there a seconder?

Photo of Michelle RowlandMichelle Rowland (Greenway, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Communications) Share this | | Hansard source

I second the motion.

Photo of Ian GoodenoughIan Goodenough (Moore, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Is leave granted?

Photo of Alan TudgeAlan Tudge (Aston, Liberal Party, Minister for Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs) Share this | | Hansard source

No, leave is not granted. There are important reports to be tabled, and there is an ordinary course of events which we should be going through today.

Photo of Scott BuchholzScott Buchholz (Wright, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

A point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I'm perplexed. It's 12 o'clock, and I thought we were going on to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works. Could I have some clarification on procedure please?

Photo of Tony SmithTony Smith (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

Just before I proceed to any question, if the member for Isaacs could clarify for me and for the House—I wasn't in the chair; there seems to be some confusion—did the member for Isaac seek leave or not?

Photo of Mark DreyfusMark Dreyfus (Isaacs, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Attorney General) Share this | | Hansard source

No. It was very clear to the deputy speaker that I had not sought leave.

Photo of Tony SmithTony Smith (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

Therefore, the question is that the motion moved by the member for Isaacs be agreed to.