House debates Questions without Notice

Goods and Services Tax

Thursday, 4 February 2016 House of Representatives

Chris Bowen

Chris Bowen McMahon, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Treasurer

2:07 pm

My question is to the Treasurer. On Neil Mitchell's program last year, the Treasurer described leadership rumblings as, 'a bit of political bed-wetting by some'. A source in today's Financial Review, on the front page, describes coalition MPs who oppose a rise in the GST as 'bed-wetters'. Treasurer, is this a coincidence? When will the Treasurer finally come clean with the Australian people and his own colleagues about his plan to increase the price of everything, with a 15 per cent GST?

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

Before I call the Treasurer, I do not believe the first part of the question is within the standing orders. The very last part of the question, relating to tax, is. The Treasurer can address the issue of tax.

Scott Morrison

Scott Morrison Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer

2:08 pm

I thank the member for the question. I thought the shadow Treasurer might want to ask me something about the economy, the transition that is taking place or the issues that are happening in global markets—something like that—but he wants to focus on trivia.

Mr Dreyfus interjecting—

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

The member for Isaacs will cease interjecting!

Scott Morrison

Scott Morrison Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer

I will give him some advice. I will give him some advice in relation to the last part of the question. I will quote someone else who was on radio today. In fact, the former Prime Minister and Treasurer, Paul Keating, was talking to Alan Jones this morning. Here is a bit of advice: 'When Commonwealth revenue has been so affected'—this is what Paul Keating said to Alan Jones—'the penny ought to drop that what we should be doing is cutting spending.' That is what the former Treasurer, Paul Keating—he was referring to me—said and has said for some weeks now. On this point, he is actually right.

What we are doing on this side of the House is reducing government spending as a share of the economy from 25.9 per cent down to 25.3 per cent. If we had done nothing over the last several years, it would have hit 26.5 per cent of GDP under the high-spending, high-taxing policies of those who previously occupied these benches. On this side of the House, we are absolutely committed to getting the fiscal consolidation plans implemented, because, at times like this, when we know of the volatility that is occurring globally and we have Australians looking at what could be happening to their savings and their investments and all of these things, they will look at these things with some uncertainty. That is why the government has to focus on strengthening our financial position and not engage in the reckless tax-and-spend approach which left this government with the reckless fiscal position those opposite bequeathed to us. As a government, we are focused on the task of strengthening our budget and strengthening our finances, and the former Treasurer, Paul Keating, says we have that right.

Hansard source

Tibor Majlath: If Paul Keating agrees with the Coalition then he must be right.

Don't governments spend in bad times to provide fiscal stimulus to a sluggish economy and go into deficit? Don't governments cut spending in good times to put on the economic brakes to prevent overheating and thereby generate a surplus? Perhaps, that no longer applies in the 21st. Century.

The Coalition kept telling us the economy was in bad shape for six years under Labor. Then in government the Coalition said it was the budget that was in crisis.

But isn't the state of the budget being confused with national and global economic conditions? The current logic says that a poor fiscal position requires cutting spending to 'repair the budget'. But is it the right time to be cutting spending in such a weak economic environment which even the Treasurer admits is a bit volatile? Between a rock and a hard place. Read 1 more comment

Link to this