House debates Questions without Notice

Crime

Thursday, 26 June 2014 House of Representatives

Steve Irons

Steve Irons Swan, Liberal Party

2:55 pm

My question is to the Minister for Justice. Will the minister inform the House how the government has made our communities safer? How does this government's approach differ from the previous government's?

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

I thank the member for Swan for that question. I was very pleased to join him recently in his electorate to announce that we would be spending $100,000 in conjunction with the City of Belmont to provide CCTV for the Belmont town centre.

Mr Bowen interjecting—

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The member for McMahon is warned!

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

The member for Swan and I met with a local cafe owner in his electorate who had been repeatedly broken into. The CCTV we are installing will cover the area where his business operates and will act as a deterrent for his business being broken into in this way.

Mr Fitzgibbon interjecting—

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The member for Hunter will desist!

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

As the House would be aware, the money we are using for the Safer Streets Program—where the $100,000 for the City of Belmont comes from—is from the confiscated assets account. We are spending it on crime fighting initiatives all around the country. Labor were using it to prop up their dodgy budget.

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The member for Hunter on a point of order, and it is not an invitation to just repeat the question.

Joel Fitzgibbon

Joel Fitzgibbon Hunter, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Agriculture

He is taking the funding away for CCTV cameras in Maitland, in my electorate.

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

That is a further abuse of the standing orders. The next person who abuses the standing orders will leave immediately under standing order 94(a).

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

The reality is we are spending proceeds of crime money on crime-fighting initiatives all over Australia—

Mr Bowen interjecting—

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

I have warned the member for McMahon. He will leave under standing order 94(a) as well.

The member for McMahon then left the chamber.

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

as opposed to what the Labor Party did when they were in office, which was to use this money to prop up their dodgy budget. If we had not made this decision, there would have been $112 million in that account by the financial year 2017-18, money that we are now using to help law enforcement agencies all around Australia do their job.

The good thing about CCTV is that when it captures footage of people doing the wrong thing it is very hard for them to deny it. The camera never lies. That is why I was a bit surprised after the member for Grayndler said on Tuesday in the House that the Labor Party does not associate with criminals that I came across this photograph of the member for Grayndler associating with notorious criminal Craig Thomson, a man who has been convicted of 65 charges of dishonesty. Sadly, he is not the only one. We have the member for Watson, who likes to holiday in Eddie Obeid's alpine lodge. His defence is that he did not have skiing relations with that man. We have the member for Wills, who was actually a referee for Tony Mokbel. I have plenty of other examples—

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

I will hear the member for Grayndler, but I remind him that an abuse of the standing orders will see him leaving.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

Absolutely, Madam Speaker. You know full well that a serious standing order is reflection on members.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

Reflection on members. If we want to have a free-for-all, we are up for it. We are up for it, but we will have it.

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The member will resume his seat, and the minister will resume his seat. The member for Grayndler will withdraw those remarks as being a reflection on the chair.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

I withdraw, Madam Speaker.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport

I did not—

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

And you will resume your seat.

Mr Albanese interjecting—

The member will resume his seat!

Honourable members interjecting—

There will be silence. Should there be a statement that implies that the member is by his actions himself committing some act which is illegal, then that is a reflection on the member.

Mr Albanese interjecting—

The member will resume his seat!

Mr Dreyfus interjecting—

The member for Isaacs will also resume his seat. I am in the middle of saying something.

As you know, an imputation against a member is contrary to the standing orders. So, if the minister is imputing to the member who is in a photograph that he is somehow committing an illegal act, that is imputing and reflecting upon the member and is not in accordance with the standing orders. If a minister merely says a photograph exists which has certain people in it, that is not a reflection. So I would ask the minister—

Mr Albanese interjecting—

Resume your seat! I would ask the minister, when he returns to the dispatch box to continue his answer, to bear that in mind and to not reflect on members. And, if there has been a reflection, he might assist the House by withdrawing any reflection. But, in accordance with my ruling, he may cite that people were in photographs together.

Mr Albanese interjecting—

Resume your seat! The minister has the call.

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

Thank you for the call, Madam Speaker. We are talking about someone who for three years propped up the former Labor government.

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The minister will resume his seat. I will hear from the member for Isaacs.

Mark Dreyfus

Mark Dreyfus Isaacs, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Attorney General

Madam Speaker, standing order 90 has two parts. You have referred only to half of standing order 90. The other part is: 'all personal reflections on other members shall be considered highly disorderly'. It is not a matter of—

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop

Mrs Bronwyn Bishop Speaker

The member will resume his seat.

Mr Dreyfus interjecting—

The member shall resume his seat.

Mr Dreyfus interjecting—

The member will resume his seat! In my answer, if you had been listening, you would have heard that I also referred to reflections. Now, in accordance with that ruling, I would ask the minister to continue his answer.

Michael Keenan

Michael Keenan Stirling, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice

Thank you, Madam Speaker. I withdraw, in the interests of the House. But I have other examples. There is a former president of the Labor Party, Michael Williamson. He is in jail for 7½ years for fraud. I will let the evidence speak for itself.