House debates Personal Explanations

Tuesday, 1 June 2010 House of Representatives

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

3:39 pm

Mr Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

Does the honourable member claim to have been misrepresented?

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

Grievously.

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

During question time, the member for Jagajaga misrepresented me by omission by deliberately excluding my other remarks in the radio interview to which she referred, such as my celebration of the modern-day success of women such as Gail Kelly at Westpac.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

Order! The member for O’Connor needs to show where he was misrepresented and not debate the question.

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

I am stating the facts of the misrepresentation by omission. In other words, if you leave out half the story, you tell a lie.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

The member for O’Connor has made his point. By the way he has phrased it, he is starting to indicate that he is going to debate the question—

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

I am not going to debate it. I am too old for that.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

By the use of certain expressions he is widening it. Unless he has anything else to add to address his alleged misrepresentation, I will have to sit him down.

Wilson Tuckey

Wilson Tuckey O'Connor, Liberal Party

Yes. The member for Jagajaja omitted my reference to gene transfer in the Ablett family in the arena of human sport, and of course the circumstances where the female partner is the principal breadwinner in a family, and there is the resulting negative financial effect of parenthood that the Abbott scheme has an answer to.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

The member for O’Connor has made his point.

Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition

3:41 pm

Mr Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

Does the honourable member claim to have been misrepresented?

Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition

I do—

Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition

repeatedly by the Prime Minister, who is a serial offender in this matter. He claimed in parliament today that the opposition’s paid parental leave proposal involved a levy on businesses with a $5 million turnover. This is just wrong. It is absolutely wrong. It is completely wrong. It is a lie, and he should be—

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House

Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order and ask that the comment be withdrawn.

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

There was nothing in the first part which I could hear. When I was speaking over the Leader of the Opposition I do not know whether anything unparliamentary was said, but I did not think so. I am not sure whether it was at the start of the contribution or at the end of the contribution.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House

That was not a personal explanation. We are seeing an abuse of personal explanations by those opposite. The opposition leader indicated it at the beginning of his contribution. He then went on to use unparliamentary language—

Harry Jenkins

Harry Jenkins Speaker

Order! The Leader of the House will resume his seat. As I said to him, the only thing that I heard was at the start, where there was an unnecessary addition. But, regarding the explanation, I asked the Leader of the Opposition to resume his seat because I thought that there might be trouble coming and I thought that he had had the opportunity to at least get his point on the record. There was nothing that I could hear at that point that needed to be withdrawn. Unfortunately, because there are no papers, I do not have the opportunity to review the situation.