House debates

Thursday, 5 March 2026

Questions without Notice

Gambling Advertising

3:10 pm

Photo of Milton DickMilton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Hansard source

Well, no, it doesn't. The question contained a number of parts, including the timeline for the Murphy report about the impact of this issue on community. You were specific about when the government will be responding to the report and on what date. That was the last part of the question, and it was borderline because you're imputing a motive by the Prime Minister there.

The minister is being directly relevant. I'm listening to her carefully about what the government is doing on that topic. If she were talking about something else, she would not be directly relevant. If she were talking about another policy topic I'd pull her into line, but I'm listening to her carefully and making sure that she's being directly relevant to the question she was asked. I'll ask her to remain directly relevant.

Comments

No comments