Andrew Willcox (Dawson, Liberal National Party, Shadow Assistant Minister for Manufacturing and Sovereign Capability) Share this | Hansard source

I welcome the contingent from the Queensland parliament. It's nice to see you folks here. This is about the agriculture statement, but what it should be about is how Labor has failed the agricultural sector in this country. In my neck of the woods, lets start with the fishing industry. In the last term of parliament, the then environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, decided to shut down the fishing industry, the gillnet fishing industry within my electorate, where fisherman for many decades have been catching barramundi, salmon and flathead. This is all about supposedly looking after the Great Barrier Reef. Let me tell you that a gillnet goes nowhere near the Great Barrier Reef. They're more than 60 miles away from the Great Barrier Reef. They're used in inshore fisheries. They were shut down. The fine fishermen and women are actually monitored. They have cameras on them. They have to log in when they go fishing, and they have to log out. It's a fully licensed and fully sustainable wild-caught industry—but, no, it's totally shut down. So then what happens? The chandlery shops, the boat builders, the outboard mechanics and the ice-makers all go to the wall as well. It's just an absolute disgrace.

Let's have a look at the live sheep trade. They shut down the live sheep trade last year. And why did they do that? It was done to keep their mates the Greens happy and to make sure that all those little preferences came sneaking through—a little belly tickle to make sure everything was going alright there. This wasn't done because of science. The only science involved in this was political science.

I've been over and had a look, as part of the inquiry into live sheep trade, and there were less than one per cent mortality rates. When the sheep are travelling across on the boat, they are actually better looked after than they are in the paddock. There's a higher mortality rate in the paddock. I've seen fourth and fifth-generation farmers in tears about potentially losing their farms—all for this absolute nonsense. I've been on the boat. I've seen the ventilation. I've seen the food and water supplies. There are vets on board. There are people walking around monitoring the sheep on the ships. It's a world-class industry and it's been shut down for no good reason.

Let's have a look at biosecurity. The Albanese Labor government has brought in biosecurity measures that have never been seen before. The biosecurity measures now are making our Australian farmers pay for the biosecurity risks of their competitors. It's absolutely disgraceful and unheard of.

Let's look at labour, because you can't run a farm without a labour force. We had a PALM scheme with our Polynesian neighbours that was working exceptionally well, but Labor came in and they had to change it. Where I come from, if it's not broke, you don't try to fix it. We had the ag visa. We're calling on the Albanese Labor government to bring back the ag visa. When farmers don't have enough workforce, the fruit and veggies fall on the ground. What does that mean for you at home? That means your produce will be more expensive in the supermarket. It's that simple—supply and demand. What's even worse is, if the farmers haven't got a workforce that they know is going to be there to harvest their crop, they won't plant as much. They scale their business back. So this is bad for productivity and bad for the farm, but it's also bad for the consumer because you pay more at the check-out. Every time people go to the check-out now to buy their fruit and veggies and see how much extra these will cost them, they should see Prime Minister Albanese's face on that receipt. They're just paying too much.

Energy costs under this government have gone through the roof, and farmers use a lot of energy. Farmers use a lot of electricity. I'm a farmer myself, so I'd know. When you pick the crop and cool it down, that takes a lot of energy. But this Albanese Labor government's reckless race to renewables has seen the energy costs go through the roof. I've got canefarmers in my area that can't irrigate their cane, because they simply can't afford the energy cost. This is crazy when you think about it. If you had cheaper energy costs, they could pump more water and grow more crops—crops that photosynthesise, that pull carbon dioxide out of the air and turn it into oxygen. Why wouldn't you want to do that? If you're interested in saving the planet, that to me sounds like a very, very good idea.

Where else has this government let the agriculture sector down? The supply chains. In the last season alone, the Bruce Highway in my electorate, the electorate of Dawson, was cut in six places. In one spot, it was cut four times. There was an announcement at the election for $7.2 billion, and we welcomed that. Thank you very much for that. But, again, the little secret behind that is there's only $336 million available. The rest of it has been kicked out to the never-never. That was never really told.

When we talk about renewables and transmission lines, this reckless race to renewables is taking up so much good quality agricultural land to put solar panels and wind turbines on it. And let's not forget the 28,000 kilometres of poles and wires. That's going through agricultural land, land that should be used for growing the food and the fibre for this nation. I'm not against renewables in the right spot. I think we need an energy mix. We need to make sure we can have the electron deliver to the farm, to the household and to the business as cheaply as possible. I'm agnostic to it. What I'm against is when you put solar panels all over good-quality agricultural land. They should be on rooftops, they should be on top of parking lots at Coles and Woolworths, and on top of those buildings—not on good-quality agricultural land. Certainly, the transmission lines for 28,000 kilometres are absolutely ridiculous. This is pitting mate against mate and family members against family members within the area—not good enough.

In other industries, the Mount Isa copper smelter is almost at the point of closing. We've called the government and asked for a Senate inquiry about metal manufacturing in Australia. Why is this so important agriculture? The gas from that smelter is the byproduct used for making MAP and DAP, the sources for soluble phosphate. That's very important to Australia, and we need to get behind these industries. We talk about a manufacturing plan to have more things made in Australia—which we should have, we should be sufficient. It should not be used by name alone; it should actually have something done about it.

Talking about farmers at risk, you need to listen to this one. Farmers are at risk because this is what your government is about to do. It's going to tax unrealised capital gains on the family farm. I'll explain to you how that works. When you've got a farm and you've got that in your super fund, and a valuer comes along and says, 'That's worth $2 million more,' that farmer might not have that in cash—you might have a really bad season—but you have to pay the tax bill on that, so where do they get the money? We really need to take this on board, and I urge you to vote against this when you think about it, because the taxing of unrealised capital gains is an absolute nonsense.

In summing up, I urge the Albanese Labor government to rethink what they've done to the fishing industry, rethink what they've done to the live sheep trade, rethink the biosecurity—because no-one else in the world does that. It's an absolute disgrace to make our farmers pay for their overseas competitors—absolutely ridiculous. Get the PALM scheme back on track and the ag visa back on track, look after our infrastructure and look after the farmers, because without farmers, you'll all be starving, naked and sober.

Debate adjourned.

See this speech in context