House debates

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

Bills

Transport Security Amendment (Serious or Organised Crime) Bill 2016; Second Reading

11:10 am

Photo of Kevin HoganKevin Hogan (Page, National Party) Share this | Hansard source

I rise to support this Transport Security Amendment (Serious or Organised Crime) Bill 2016. The current ice problem is not some nightmare based in a distant land. It is on our streets, in our towns and in our homes. The unfortunate addicts are real. They are in our communities. They are our neighbours and family members. Between 2010 and 2014 the amount of ice seized at the Australian border grew almost 60 times. Police made record busts and 26,000 arrests for possession or distribution of this drug.

This bill will ensure that people with a relevant criminal history can never receive a security clearance to work at Australian airports and seaports. It will make it harder for drug dealers to bring ice into our country and our community. Organised crime is a serious threat to our security and prosperity as a nation. Recently, the Australian Crime Commission estimated that organised crime cost the Australian economy $36 billion annually. In 2013, the government made a commitment to ensuring that people with a history of serious or organised crime would not receive a security clearance to work at our Australian airports and seaports. In 2015, the government also committed to comprehensive action on the drug ice. The National Ice Taskforce, in its final report released late last year, estimated that there are currently well over 200,000 Australian users.

The National Ice Taskforce identified as a clear priority the need for targeted and coordinated law enforcement efforts to disrupt the supply of ice, specifically by protecting the aviation and maritime environments against organised crime, by strengthening the eligibility criteria for the aviation and maritime security identification card schemes also known as the ASIC and MSIC schemes.

The Transport Security Amendment (Serious or Organised Crime) Bill 2016 will amend the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 and the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003, aimed at reducing criminal influence at our airports and seaports by strengthening the ASIC and MSIC schemes. The aviation and maritime acts establish a regulatory framework to safeguard against unlawful interference with the aviation and maritime sectors. Unlawful interference is defined in the aviation and maritime acts as conduct that threatens the safe operation of aircraft and airports, ports and ships, and behaviour that may cause harm to passengers, crew, aviation and maritime personnel and the general public, or damage to property.

This bill will create an additional purpose to prevent the use of aviation and maritime transport or offshore facilities in connection with serious or organised crime. This additional purpose will only apply to the administration of the ASIC and MSIC schemes and not to the regulation of the aviation and maritime sectors more broadly. The ASIC and MSIC schemes are important security measures that are intended to protect both sectors. They require all persons, including foreign nationals, who require unescorted access to secure aviation and maritime areas, including offshore oil and gas facilities, to undergo a comprehensive background check. The background check includes a criminal history check, a national security assessment and, for non-citizens, an immigration status check.

Under the current system, if an applicant is convicted of a wide range of serious and minor aviation or maritime security related offences, this person is likely to be given an adverse security status. The list of aviation and maritime security relevant offences is contained in the Aviation Transport Security Regulations 2005 and the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Regulations 2003 and is collectively known as the eligibility criteria for the ASIC and MSIC schemes. Applicants who receive an adverse security assessment are ineligible to be granted an ASIC or MSIC. However, they can make an application to the Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development for discretionary approval to be granted, depending on the nature of the offence.

The amendments proposed by the bill provide the regulatory framework to enable the introduction of new eligibility criteria for the ASIC and MSIC schemes. The new criteria better target serious or organised crime and will ensure that people with a history of serious or organised crime do not receive clearance to access secure areas and exploit our aviation and maritime sectors However, modelling suggests that the new eligibility criteria will also result in more people with minor criminal offences being found eligible, without needing to go through the discretionary card process.

The new eligibility criteria will be set out in the aviation and maritime regulations and introduce additional categories of offences such as offences under anticriminal organisation legislation, foreign incursion and recruitment offences, illegal importation of goods and interfering with goods under Border Force control. Currently, the same offence can have different implications depending on whether you are applying for an ASIC or an MSIC. The bill will provide for the alignment of the eligibility criteria in the aviation and maritime regulations so that the same criteria apply across the aviation and maritime sectors.

The bill also promotes greater consistency between the aviation and maritime acts. The change will also result in greater transparency and accountability, with express regulation-making powers for the administration of the ASIC and MSIC schemes, rather than the current reliance on general regulation-making powers in the act. Specifically, the bill will amend the maritime act to clearly provide for all persons seeking to access secure maritime zones to undertake background checks. This change in the bill seeks to reinforce and clarify the legislative basis for a system that is already in place in administering the ASIC and MSIC system and reflects existing provisions in the aviation act.

This bill will continue to give effect to Australia's international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code. It will also improve the government's ability to combat transnational and domestic organised crime.

Importantly, this bill implements one of the government's key strategies in the fight to combat the drug ice. In December last year, the National Ice Taskforce, chaired by Ken Lay APM, released its final report, which made 38 recommendations across five priority areas. One of these recommendations, adopted by the government in its response to the final report, was to continue to protect the aviation and maritime environments against organised crime by strengthening the eligibility criteria. This bill will give effect to this element of the government's comprehensive package of action. I commend this bill to the House.

Comments

No comments