Nicola Roxon (Gellibrand, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Health and Ageing) Share this | Hansard source

If the members opposite would like to listen to the answer, they would find that in the Intergenerational report it is clear that the private health insurance rebate is growing faster than all other expenditure in health and needs of course to be reined in. What is important to understand is the measures that have been introduced have been designed to ensure that the participation rate is not significantly affected. Our changes are designed to have a minimal impact on participation, with 99.7 per cent of people projected to maintain their hospital cover.

Now that we have the opportunity with this bill going again to the Senate, we will see how serious the opposition, in particular the new finance spokesperson, is about a measure that will save $2 billion over the next four years. I know that the Leader of the Opposition does know that $2 billion is a lot of money. In fact I also know that he knows that health and hospitals cost a lot of money. He told the Australian late last year that one of the problems with hospitals is, ‘There is not enough money.’ I wonder why there is not enough money when, as health minister, the Leader of the Opposition oversaw $1 billion being pulled out of our public hospitals and then has the audacity to say, ‘The problem with hospitals is they do not have enough money.’ Why is that, I ask the Leader of the Opposition? The Leader of the Opposition is very good at identifying problems—hospitals need more money—but he does not have any solutions. His only solution when he was in government was to actually rip money out of our public hospitals. He is very good at being all complaint but no solution.

In contrast our government has been investing in health busily for the last two years block by block, rebuilding the system that was pulled apart by the Leader of the Opposition. Now we have an opportunity to save $2 billion in a very fair and reasonable way over the next four years, nearly $10 billion over the projections for about the next 10-year period and we know it grows exponentially on Treasury advice to $100 billion by the middle of the century. This can easily be effected and it is a policy which we think is fair. It is about making private health insurance sustainable. If the new finance spokesperson meant anything at all when he said he would keep an open mind and look at anything that would deliver a net saving to the budget, the opposition would be getting on board and supporting this measure in the Senate.

See this speech in context