House debates

Tuesday, 29 May 2007

Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2007-2008; Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2007-2008; Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2007-2008; Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2006-2007; Appropriation Bill (No. 6) 2006-2007

Second Reading

6:36 pm

Photo of Warren EntschWarren Entsch (Leichhardt, Liberal Party) Share this | Hansard source

Before I comment on the Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2007-2008 and cognate bills, I would like to commend the previous speaker, the member for Blaxland, on his contribution. He has been an outstanding representative of his electorate, and it is a tragedy that very strong, capable, grassroots members lose their preselection through underhanded tactics. I believe, like the member for Blaxland, that when we come into this place we do so to represent our constituency. We do not come in here to represent our factions. We should be focusing, as he has done very effectively, on our own constituency. Unfortunately, he has paid the price, because of those who have been scheming in the back rooms. We need to look very closely at that. It is a warning to those on his side—as, I am sure, it would be to anyone in politics—not to lose sight of what we are here for. I am pleased to say that I do not believe that the member for Blaxland has ever lost sight of the fact that he is here for his constituency.

I think the place is richer for your contribution, and it is a sad and sorry day to see you leaving in the way that you have to. I am pleased to see that your fine wife is here to witness your contribution—your last on the appropriation bills. I will certainly miss you, and I wish you well. I just hope to goodness that people will see the errors of their ways and, at the end of the day, get back to what we are here for—representing our constituencies, not so much the party and certainly not the factions. You have paid a big price for it, and you will be missed in this place.

Comments

No comments