House debates

Tuesday, 20 March 2007

Airports Amendment Bill 2006

Second Reading

Debate resumed from 1 March, on motion by Mr Vaile:

That this bill be now read a second time.

upon which Mr Martin Ferguson moved by way of amendment:

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House condemns the Government for undermining public confidence in the Airports Act through approval decisions such as that relating to the Perth brickworks site, located opposite a residential area, and the Essendon direct factory outlet, proposed without regard to the impact on local road infrastructure”.

Comments

No comments