House debates

Monday, 11 September 2006

Independent Contractors Bill 2006; Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Independent Contractors) Bill 2006

Second Reading

Debate resumed from 17 August, on motion by Mr Andrews:

That this bill be now read a second time.

upon which Mr Stephen Smith moved by way of amendment:

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: “whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that this bill:

(1)
follows on from the Government’s extreme industrial relations changes which are a massive attack on living standards and living conditions, by removing rights, entitlements and conditions of Australian employees;
(2)
also removes rights, entitlements, conditions and protections afforded to Australians in the workplace, whether employees or independent contractors;
(3)
does this by allowing employees to be treated as “independent contractors”, thereby removing employee protections and entitlements and placing superannuation, tax, and workers’ compensation burdens on them;
(4)
does this by removing protections from independent contractors who are in a dependent contract position and as a consequence in an unequal bargaining position;
(5)
effects this by:
(a)
continuing to use the common law definition of independent contractor as the basis of law without the guidance of statutory criteria;
(b)
allowing employees to be treated as independent contractors in a sham way by ineffective anti-sham provisions;
(c)
overriding State laws with employee deeming provisions;
(d)
overriding State unfair contracts provisions which provide protection to employees, contractors and small business;
(e)
overriding any future State and Territory owner-driver transport laws and putting existing State owner-driver transport laws at risk; and
(f)
failing to provide any genuine protections for outworkers through ineffective outworker provisions, significantly weakening outworker entitlements; and
(6)
introduces even more complexity and confusion into Australia’s workplace laws;
(7)
treats the Senate Employment and Workplace Relations Committee reporting on these matters with contempt by dealing with the legislation prior to consideration of its report”.

Comments

No comments