House debates

Tuesday, 28 March 2006

Maritime Legislation Amendment Bill 2005

Second Reading

Debate resumed from 2 March, on motion by Mr Lloyd:

That this bill be now read a second time.

upon which Mr Ripoll moved by way of amendment:

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House condemns the Government for:

(a)
failing to uphold Australia’s national interest by adopting anti-Australian shipping policies that favour foreign vessels and crew despite the risk to national security, Australian jobs and the natural environment;
(b)
failing to ensure adequate security in relation to the shipping of dangerous goods and hazardous material, including explosives precursors such as ammonium nitrate; and
(c)
failing to ensure ships comply with the requirement to provide details of crew and cargo forty-eight hours before arrival.”

Comments

No comments