House debates

Thursday, 16 February 2006

Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005

Second Reading

Debate resumed from 15 February, on motion by Dr Washer:

That this bill be now read a second time.

upon which Miss Jackie Kelly moved by way of amendment:

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: “ the House is of the opinion that the bill is unacceptable in its current form and the preferred policy approach should be:

(1)
the Minister for Health and Ageing continuing to have the decision making role in relation to the approval of restricted goods as defined in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989;
(2)
the Minister being required to obtain written advice from the Therapeutic Goods Administration prior to giving written approval or refusal to approve; and
(3)
the Minister’s decision being subject to disallowance by each House of Parliament”.

Comments

No comments