Senate debates

Thursday, 13 February 2020

Questions without Notice

Defence Equipment

2:14 pm

Photo of Marielle SmithMarielle Smith (SA, Australian Labor Party) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Defence Industry, Senator Cormann. The former Minister for Defence confirmed that 90 per cent of the work on the submarine project will be Australian. Today The Australian reports:

… local firms may not get half of the value of the subs' contracts.

Can the minister confirm what the actual level of Australian content will be?

2:15 pm

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

What I can assure Senator Smith about is that the Australian industry content building the next generation of submarines is going to be massively higher than it would have been under Labor.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order. Senator Wong on a point of order.

Photo of Penny WongPenny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

I know he's very excited, Mr President, but direct relevance. This is a serious question about the largest procurement in the nation's history. It is asking this minister representing the defence minister what the actual level of Australian content will be. I know he's very excited and wants to play politics but if he could answer the question about people's jobs, I'm sure South Australians and Western Australians would appreciate it.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! Senator Wong, you have raised your point of order. The minister was halfway through a sentence. I'm not going to rule halfway through his first sentence on direct relevance. You've reminded the minister of the question; I'll call him to continue.

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

It is our government that has committed to build the next generation of submarines. It is our government that has made the necessary decisions and put on the table the necessary investment. And it is our government that is absolutely committed to maximising Australian industry involvement.

Let me tell you the reason why my opening remarks were entirely relevant, directly relevant, to the question. What we are looking at now, in the level of Australian industry content on the back of our decisions to build 12 new submarines for Australia, is—

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Pyne promised 90 per cent. What happened to the 90 per cent?

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

What was there in the six years under Labor? Nothing. Did they decide to build a single submarine, even half a submarine? No. Nothing. Zero. Like Otis. This is what we get from the Labor Party.

The people in South Australia and the people in Australia generally know that this is a government that is committed to not only ensuring that our defence forces have got the capability they need but that our—

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order. Senator Wong on a point of order.

Photo of Penny WongPenny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

The point of order is on direct relevance. I think the Australian people do want to know what the level of Australian content is. This has been asked by Senator Patrick and Senator Griff; today it's being asked by the Labor Party. We would ask the minister to respond to the question.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

On the point of order, you've restated the question, Senator Wong. When the minister was talking about Australian content and the building of the project, I do consider that to be directly relevant. I cannot instruct him how to answer a question. Senator Cormann.

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

Under our government, we have committed to building 12 new submarines and we are committed to maximising Australian industry content. The Australian people know that under Labor not a single cent was invested in our future submarine capability.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Smith, a supplementary question.

2:17 pm

Photo of Marielle SmithMarielle Smith (SA, Australian Labor Party) Share this | | Hansard source

When did the minister become aware that less than 50 per cent of the work for the future submarines would be done in Australia?

2:18 pm

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

I don't accept the premise of the question and I refer Senator Smith to my previous answer.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Smith, a final supplementary question.

Photo of Marielle SmithMarielle Smith (SA, Australian Labor Party) Share this | | Hansard source

When did the Morrison government advise the South Australian Liberal government that the level of local content would be less than 50 per cent of the value of the contracts?

Senator Payne interjecting

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

As Senator Payne rightly just observed, just because you keep repeating the same false assertion, it doesn't make it come true. I reject the premise of the question. As I said in my primary answer, we are absolutely committed to maximising Australian industry content.