Here's the comment you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!
Posted on 24 Mar 2020 12:59 pm
The wildlife part of this bill, referring to clearing up congestion in wildlife matters, does not mean that shortcuts should be taken, and wildlife suffer. That has already been happening too much and is obvious. The assessment of wildlife issues should be thorough and they should ensure that wildlife is not disadvantaged.
Wildlife have no voice, they have no weapons or poisons and they do not actually hurt human beings. They do a great deal of good and are part of the environment because they contribute, even if human beings can't see it or think they can do it better. All matters of wildlife should have a panel of people with hands on experience who decide wildlife issues, and do so with diligence.
Why should this comment be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the comment breaks them.
About us Contact OpenAustralia.org Link to us House rules API / XML Source code Blog / Twitter
Other Wonderful Projects from the OpenAustralia Foundation:
They Vote For You |
Right To Know |