Stephen Bates's recent appearances (OpenAustralia.org)
type: channel
language: en-gb
creator: OpenAustralia.org, mprss.php script
date: 2025-09-07T23:05:16+00:00
items: International Relations: Australia and the United States of America | Questions without Notice | House debates
items: Tropical Cyclone Alfred | Statements on Indulgence | House debates
items: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Reconsiderations) Bill 2025; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Taxation | Constituency Statements | House debates
items: Taxation | Questions without Notice | House debates
items: Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024; Consideration in Detail | Bills | House debates
items: Australian Society | Statements by Members | House debates
items: Health Legislation Amendment (Improved Medicare Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Climate Change | Matters of Public Importance | House debates
items: Health Legislation Amendment (Modernising My Health Record - Sharing by Default) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Climate Change | Questions without Notice | House debates
items: Sydney Airport Demand Management Amendment Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
items: Parliamentary Representation | Statements by Members | House debates
items: Universities | Questions without Notice | House debates
items: Health Care | Private Members' Business | House debates
items: Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates

International Relations: Australia and the United States of America | Questions without Notice | House debates
type: item
description: My question is to the Prime Minister still. Given Trump's attacks on democracy and Western institutions, and even threatening our allies and even the PBS, why would you invite him to Australia?
encoded: My question is to the Prime Minister still. Given Trump's attacks on democracy and Western institutions, and even threatening our allies and even the PBS, why would you invite him to Australia?
date: 2025-03-27T15:04:00+00:00

International Relations: Australia and the United States of America | Questions without Notice | House debates
type: item
description: My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, why would you invite Donald Trump to Australia when you've got a Temu Trump sitting right opposite you?
encoded: My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, why would you invite Donald Trump to Australia when you've got a Temu Trump sitting right opposite you?
date: 2025-03-27T15:04:00+00:00

Tropical Cyclone Alfred | Statements on Indulgence | House debates
type: item
description: I want to start by saying, from the bottom of my heart, thank you to the people in Brisbane for their help preparing and recovering from Cyclone Alfred. In the wake of heavy wind and flooding, I...
encoded: I want to start by saying, from the bottom of my heart, thank you to the people in Brisbane for their help preparing and recovering from Cyclone Alfred. In the wake of heavy wind and flooding, I want to extend my deepest gratitude to every individual and volunteer organisation that stepped up. The resilience, community spirit and unwavering dedication were truly inspiring. In the two weeks that followed the heavy wind and rain, here's some of what we were able to achieve through my electorate office: we had 158 volunteers, 223 volunteer shifts and 892 volunteer hours. We moved eight tonnes of green waste clear from gardens, driveways and verges. Four-hundred meals were served to residents in power affected suburbs, and dozens of personal drop-offs of care packages for residents with mobility issues were made as well. As always, I want to give a heartfelt thank you to all of our emergency responders: the SES, Queensland fire and emergency services, paramedics and frontline workers, who all worked tirelessly to keep the community safe. Finally, to every Brisbane resident who followed the safety advice, checked in on loved ones and showed resilience in the face of adversity—thank you. Your courage and unity reminds everyone that together we can overcome anything. Unfortunately, these extreme weather events are only going to become much more common. The climate crisis is something we are already feeling; 2024 was the hottest year in recorded history and the hottest for Australia's oceans. Month after month, we're in a world that is hotter, wetter and more turbulent, with extreme weather events happening more and more frequently and with frighteningly more intensity. Tropical cyclones have long been a reality for many in Australia and the Pacific, but climate change is making them more intense and destructive, and they're moving further south. As our climate rapidly changes, the waters off Australia's east coast are becoming exceptionally warm, providing the perfect cond…
date: 2025-03-26T12:30:00+00:00

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Reconsiderations) Bill 2025; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: I move the amendment to the amendment circulated by the member for Fairfax in my name: That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "The House declines...
encoded: I move the amendment to the amendment circulated by the member for Fairfax in my name: That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "The House declines to give the bill a second reading and notes the government is using the cover of the budget to rush through legislation that trashes environment laws instead of passing laws to cut student debt and triple the bulk billing incentive for GPs". Yet again we have this Labor government rushing through a dirty deal with the coalition. This legislation seeks to trash our environment laws and push our precious native species to extinction. The Australian Conservation Foundation said today that this bill will mean nature is more poorly protected at the end of the Albanese government's three-year term than it was at the start of it. This prime minister came to office with claims that the captain's calls had ended. But today, with this bill, we see the Prime Minister rushing through legislation, all to placate polluting industries and lock in species extinction. Australia is facing an environmental crisis. We have one of the highest rates of species extinction in the world and ongoing destruction of our natural ecosystems. There is no question about it; our current environmental laws are failing to protect our biodiversity. Despite promises from this government, critical reforms continue to be delayed, all while leaving species and ecosystems vulnerable to further degradation. If you want to halt the extinction crisis then saying, 'We will get to it later. We will do it next time,' is not going to cut it. We must implement stronger enforceable environmental protections as a matter of urgency. But instead, this proposed legislation has sidelined science and sends our wildlife into extinction. It undermines legal protections and has far-reaching consequences for our community and planet. Environment laws are supposed to protect the environment, not greenlight destruction and extinction. …
date: 2025-03-25T16:56:00+00:00

Taxation | Constituency Statements | House debates
type: item
description: According to Oxfam, $67,000 is how much the average billionaire in Australia makes every hour. It's over 1,300 times more than the average Australian. Last year the wealth of billionaires in this...
encoded: According to Oxfam, $67,000 is how much the average billionaire in Australia makes every hour. It's over 1,300 times more than the average Australian. Last year the wealth of billionaires in this country grew by more than eight per cent—roughly $28 billion or about $3.2 million per hour. All these numbers can sound overwhelming, unreal even. It's the dragon hoarding the medieval peasant towns' wealth—all this wealth being amassed in the pockets of the already megawealthy while the rest of the country sees living standards decline and life become more unaffordable. We are truly living through a new Gilded Age, watching economic inequality increase every year. The cost-of-living crisis did not create a new problem; it simply laid bare a problem that had been brewing for decades. According to research done by the Australia Institute, the wealth of the richest 200 people in this country has grown from the equivalent of 8.4 per cent of GDP in 2004 to 23.7 per cent now. This is wildly unsustainable. Our entire economy is based on the principle of supply and demand. If we continue down the path of more and more wealth being amassed in fewer and fewer hands, how does anyone expect our economy to survive? It can't and it won't. Billionaires and giant multinational companies calling the shots on policy and setting the framework for what is even considered possible in politics cannot last forever. I said before that we are living through a new Gilded Age; that age ended with the start of the Great Depression. If we do not learn from our past, we are just condemned to repeat it. So it's time for a new vision. We have a unique opportunity here in Australia, for better or worse, being about 10 years or so behind the US and UK. We have time to make the changes that we need, and it starts with making sure the ultrawealthy and the multinational corporations pay their fair share of tax. Everyone else does, so they should too. What's worse is they already do elsewhere. Soon after Norw…
date: 2025-02-13T09:37:00+00:00

Taxation | Questions without Notice | House debates
type: item
description: My question is to the Prime Minister. Currently billionaires are making out like bandits while everyone else is being squeezed. Yesterday the Greens announced a plan for Australia's 150...
encoded: My question is to the Prime Minister. Currently billionaires are making out like bandits while everyone else is being squeezed. Yesterday the Greens announced a plan for Australia's 150 billionaires to pay an annual 10 per cent billionaire tax on their net wealth, which would raise $50 billion over the decade. Prime Minister, do you agree it is time billionaires paid their fair share to ensure everyone can get access to the services they need, such as seeing the GP for free?
date: 2025-02-12T14:32:00+00:00

Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: I rise to speak to the Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025. This bill is seeking to close a loophole identified in the social security legislation by the AAT in...
encoded: I rise to speak to the Social Security Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes) Bill 2025. This bill is seeking to close a loophole identified in the social security legislation by the AAT in 2024. The consequences of this error are that for years the department and the government of the day have been misapplying the social security act, where participants were technically eligible for the higher independent disability support pension rate but were paid the lower rate. Although a drafting error, it calls into question the principles that underpin social security. The disability support pension is already a borderline poverty payment. The government should not be seeking endless ways to reduce it further. The Greens also have concerns about the scope of backpay that this bill is seeking to avoid. Participants are constantly forced to defend themselves against the state. We saw this at its peak with robodebt, but it endures through schemes like mutual obligations and Work for the Dole. It seems strange, then, for the government to seek to remedy an error that no-one cared to identify for nearly two decades. Time and time again we see participants punished for minor infractions while the government and departments throw up their hands and yell, 'Oops!' Not knowing your own legislation is not a simple mistake; it's an unbelievable oversight. Denying the higher independent rate on the mistake and understanding of an amendment from 2005 has genuine implications for participants. For these reasons the Greens will be opposing this bill. We need to seriously consider whether using the machinery of the state to make social security harder to access, more means-tested and more restricted is a genuinely productive use of time. I urge the government to take seriously all the other issues that plague the DSP. The starting point for any genuine reform should be the low rate of the DSP. As a borderline poverty payment, it forces many disabled people into a vicious cycle of poverty…
date: 2025-02-11T12:52:00+00:00

Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024; Consideration in Detail | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: Would the member for Petrie be able to clarify, regarding those amendments you have moved, that you've moved only sheet 1? My understanding is that these amendments only go to the instant asset...
encoded: Would the member for Petrie be able to clarify, regarding those amendments you have moved, that you've moved only sheet 1? My understanding is that these amendments only go to the instant asset write-off and do not remove schedule 2 of the bill. I ask just because he referenced that during his speech, so I just want to clarify.
date: 2025-02-10T13:07:00+00:00

Australian Society | Statements by Members | House debates
type: item
description: That tells you all you need to know about the Liberals—that they cheer at that. Trump and these backers want to reshape the United States and now the world into a place where the only thing...
encoded: That tells you all you need to know about the Liberals—that they cheer at that. Trump and these backers want to reshape the United States and now the world into a place where the only thing that matters is profit and the bottom line. Now similar groups have appeared in Australia. Groups like Advance and Australians for Prosperity want to do to this country what their counterparts have done to the United States—divide us, carve us up and sell our society to the highest bidder. They will not be happy until our country is a hollowed-out shell, where everything is pay-to-play. Now we see the LNP begin to back them in and follow down the same path as the Republicans—making cuts that we will only find the details of after the election, slashing the Public Service and banning investment in renewables. What will help this country to stave off far-right groups and the undue influence of giant corporations in politics? It's policies that actually improve people's lives and protect the environmental—dental into Medicare, mental health into Medicare, 100 per cent renewable energy, tripling the bulk-billing incentive for everyone so everyone can see the GP for free again and making these giant multinationals and fossil fuel companies finally pay their fair share of tax. That is what I'm in this place fighting for, and that is how we stave off the far-right and corporate takeover of our democracy.
date: 2025-02-06T13:46:00+00:00

Australian Society | Statements by Members | House debates
type: item
description: Over decades, well-funded far-right groups in the United States have been on a mission to destroy progressive politics and reshape the Republican Party to be one of division, destruction and...
encoded: Over decades, well-funded far-right groups in the United States have been on a mission to destroy progressive politics and reshape the Republican Party to be one of division, destruction and delusion. Now we have a second Trump presidency that promises to be even worse than the first.
date: 2025-02-06T13:46:00+00:00

Health Legislation Amendment (Improved Medicare Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: I move, as an amendment to the amendment proposed by Ms Ley: That all words after "the" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "House, whilst not declining to give the bill a...
encoded: I move, as an amendment to the amendment proposed by Ms Ley: That all words after "the" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "House, whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading: (1) notes that: (a) Medicare cannot be a universal healthcare system while essential dental care is excluded; and (b) the Australian Dental Association's Annual Oral Health Survey found that over 60 per cent of Australians had delayed a trip to the dentist in the previous 12 months, with cost being the main barrier; and (2) calls on the Government to legislate the inclusion of dental care into Medicare". Medicare is crucial to Australia's healthcare system, and strengthening Medicare needs to be a top priority as Australians endure this cost-of-living crisis, because our healthcare system, as it stands right now, is struggling. It's becoming rarer by the day to find a bulk-billing GP, it's nearly impossible to access mental health care support without huge gap payments, and the cost of dental care has become so expensive that millions of Australians are putting it off entirely. A properly funded universal healthcare system actually saves the country money in the long run. It reduces poverty, creates jobs and drives economic productivity. It is achievable and desperately needed, as a matter of urgency, because everyone should be able to afford to go to the dentist when they need help. Too many Australians cannot access the dentist because it is too expensive, and more people are not eligible for public dentistry than ever before. As things stand, millions of Australians are putting off going to the dentist because they simply cannot afford it. It doesn't just lead to worse teeth; it leads to a host of other health concerns that also come from this lack of access. Now, I was really fortunate that, after I was elected to this place, I was able to afford, finally, to go to the dentist and get some fillings done, because I couldn't afford them while I was in my p…
date: 2025-02-05T13:09:00+00:00

Climate Change | Matters of Public Importance | House debates
type: item
description: The science is clear. Climate pollution from gas, oil and coal is driving more intense and more frequent weather and disasters. We're already experiencing horrible summers of deadly bushfires,...
encoded: The science is clear. Climate pollution from gas, oil and coal is driving more intense and more frequent weather and disasters. We're already experiencing horrible summers of deadly bushfires, flooding and immense heat and humidity. According to reports earlier this month, it's possible that this year we have already passed 1.5 degrees Celsius of human-caused warming; 1.5 degrees was meant to be the limit, and now we have sailed past it. We're in the midst of a climate crisis right now, and we must act urgently. The planet has a very specific and tight deadline for us. We cannot negotiate with that. Research published this year indicates that Australia was the third-largest exporter of primary fossil fuels behind only Russia and the USA. When we translate this into exported emissions, Australia comes second because of the sheer size of our coal exports. From 1961 to 2023, Australia's fossil fuel exports have been responsible for emitting 30 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. All this pollution—and for what? It all gets dug up and exported, with fossil fuel giants pocketing huge profits and everyday Australians left to bear the consequences. Successive Labor and coalition governments have failed to adequately tax fossil fuel companies, and the profits of those mining booms have gone offshore. At least countries like Norway have the decency to properly tax their resources sector so citizens have something to show for it. What Australians see in return for our fossil fuel exports are increasingly severe bushfires, floods and heatwaves. We're seeing insurance costs soar, with more and more homes becoming uninsurable altogether. Collectively, Australians are paying $20 billion more today on insurance than we were only 10 years ago. Government action and inaction have shifted the cost and burden of the climate disaster off fossil fuel companies and directly onto people and communities. Since coming to office, this Labor government has approved 28 new co…
date: 2024-11-27T15:15:00+00:00

Health Legislation Amendment (Modernising My Health Record - Sharing by Default) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: The Greens will be supporting the Health Legislation Amendment (Modernising My Health Record—Sharing by Default) Bill 2024 in the House of Representatives and reserving our position in the...
encoded: The Greens will be supporting the Health Legislation Amendment (Modernising My Health Record—Sharing by Default) Bill 2024 in the House of Representatives and reserving our position in the Senate. We are in support of effective care pathways to promote greater cooperation and coordination between health services and systems. Furthermore, the Greens believe that health information and data linked to identifiable individuals should be stored with the best up-to-date security systems and protocols. There have been considerations raised by advocacy groups about the potential effects of this bill on healthcare providers. There is a likelihood that not all practices that will be subject to this legislation currently have the technical capability for the relevant information sharing. Upgrading software systems can be a costly endeavour and could be a process that would delay compliance. The Greens want to hear from the impacted practitioners about the impact that this bill would have on them. Because of this, we would like to see an inquiry into this bill which will then inform opposition in the Senate. Question agreed to. Bill read a second time. Message from the Governor-General recommending appropriation announced. Ordered that this bill be reported to the House without amendment. Federation Chamber adjourned at 19:09
date: 2024-11-26T19:07:00+00:00

Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: Prohibition doesn't work. Prohibition is not how you make social media platforms safer or empower young Australians to navigate the online world in a safe way. The Online Safety Amendment (Social...
encoded: Prohibition doesn't work. Prohibition is not how you make social media platforms safer or empower young Australians to navigate the online world in a safe way. The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill is not going to resolve the root causes of online harm. It's simply not going to work. All of us want to see more accountability for social media platforms and greater transparency for users, but this bill provides neither. Let's not forget how rushed the process has been. The government allowed for a consultation period on the bill for 24 hours. The Senate hearing for the bill was only three hours, and young people were essentially locked out from having their voices heard because of this process. We absolutely need to protect young people online, especially against the targeting, harvesting and selling of their data. A blanket ban, though, is not the way to do it. The recent parliamentary inquiry into social media heard over and over that an age ban will not make social media safer for anyone. It's complicated to implement, and it will have unintended consequences for young people. Yet here we are again, with the government and the coalition teaming up, ignoring the evidence and ramming this bill through in the final sitting week of the year. Why won't it work? This bill inserts a new definition of 'age-restricted social media platforms' which effectively puts a blanket ban on all social media platforms. The government has indicated that some platforms will be exempt, but we don't have the detail before us that we need to properly scrutinise this legislation. Leaving exemptions to regulations puts a lot of trust in the follow-through, and I'm not confident that it's going to be done effectively. The government themselves acknowledge this is not a perfect system. The Prime Minister has said: We know some kids will find workarounds, but we're sending a message to social media companies to clean up their act. The reality is that many kids, not just so…
date: 2024-11-26T18:36:00+00:00

Climate Change | Questions without Notice | House debates
type: item
description: My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, why are climate emissions higher under your government than when Scott Morrison left office?
encoded: My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, why are climate emissions higher under your government than when Scott Morrison left office?
date: 2024-11-26T14:27:00+00:00

Sydney Airport Demand Management Amendment Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: I second the amendment. Back in the seventies, the International Air Transport Association, the IATA, came up with an airline slot system to reduce airport congestion. The initial aim was to...
encoded: I second the amendment. Back in the seventies, the International Air Transport Association, the IATA, came up with an airline slot system to reduce airport congestion. The initial aim was to regulate and improve the air traffic flow during busy travel times at busy airports. Some airports in Australia fall into the category that this system regulates. It's supposed to be a 'use it or lose it' system, where airlines have to use their slots at least 80 per cent of the time, or they become available to other airlines. But over time we've seen airlines manipulate the system by slot hoarding. This is a practice whereby airlines schedule a flight and then cancel it closer to the date of departure. This makes it look like they're using their allocated slots so that they don't lose them. It's anticompetitive, keeps competition out and keeps fares higher. It's also incredibly frustrating for customers because they are having constant schedule changes and cancellations of their flights. We absolutely need to reform slot compliance and enforcement and make transparency mandatory. We cannot have a system whereby slots are hoarded by airlines and managed by airlines. It makes zero sense. But let's zoom out for a moment. There is so much more that needs to be done to fix the root issues of the aviation industry in Australia. It's a highly monopolised, highly concentrated market. The likes of Qantas and Virgin are after corporate profit while the interests of consumers, workers and communities take a back seat. During the previous government, the Liberals and Nationals gave $2.7 billion in taxpayer subsidies to Qantas, and, in exchange, what did Qantas do? They fired 10,000 workers. And the High Court found that 1,700 of those workers were fired illegally. We fast forward to the 2022-23 financial year, and Qantas recorded a record profit of $2.47 billion. They paid no income tax, and of course they've made no mention of repaying any of the billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies…
date: 2024-11-20T12:00:00+00:00

Parliamentary Representation | Statements by Members | House debates
type: item
description: If the last decade of politics has shown us anything, it's that the two-party system is going to hold Australia back the longer we let it exist. We see system change and structural reform being...
encoded: If the last decade of politics has shown us anything, it's that the two-party system is going to hold Australia back the longer we let it exist. We see system change and structural reform being passed aside for quick bandaid fixes, and Labor-LNP unity tickets on reforms to cement their power. The fear of rocking the boat too much has well and truly ingrained itself in this place. The word I hear from my community about this incumbent Labor government is 'disappointing'. After almost a decade of LNP government, people expected big, positive and progressive changes, and what we got instead was business as usual. But when you look across at the opposition, the LNP have blatantly learned nothing from the 2022 federal election. The LNP have dug their heels in and, instead of accepting climate change is a real thing, have denied the benefits of renewable energy and presented policies that exist solely to extend the life or fossil fuels as long as possible. The last decade and this term of parliament has made it abundantly clear that if we want real action on climate change and environmental protection, and if we want an economy and society that puts people before profit, then the political system is going to have to change. The two-party system has shown itself to be fundamentally incapable of delivering the positive change people want to see. The only way we are getting a progressive system change in Australian is with a bigger crossbench, more Greens and a minority government.
date: 2024-11-20T13:44:00+00:00

Universities | Questions without Notice | House debates
type: item
description: My question is to the Acting Prime Minister. Students and young people are saddled with billions of dollars of student debt. These debts can be in the tens of thousands, if not the hundreds of...
encoded: My question is to the Acting Prime Minister. Students and young people are saddled with billions of dollars of student debt. These debts can be in the tens of thousands, if not the hundreds of thousands, of dollars, making it harder for people to get their first home and to make ends meet. If the government can introduce its bill for free TAFE this week, why can't a bill to wipe 20 per cent of student debt be introduced this week as well? Why should young people and students be forced to wait to see the outcome of an election, when the government could work with the Greens to get this done now?
date: 2024-11-19T14:16:00+00:00

Health Care | Private Members' Business | House debates
type: item
description: I move: That this House: (1) notes that: (a) bulk-billing options are plummeting across the country and millions of people are delaying health care due to cost concerns; (b) the cost of living...
encoded: I move: That this House: (1) notes that: (a) bulk-billing options are plummeting across the country and millions of people are delaying health care due to cost concerns; (b) the cost of living crisis is both making mental health worse and causing an increasing number of people across Australia to delay or miss out on essential mental health care; (c) over 60 per cent of Australians have delayed dental care in the last year, and the most common reason for doing so was cost; and (d) everyone deserves to have access to good quality health care, including dental and mental health care, regardless of where you live, how old you are, or your bank balance; and (2) calls on the Government to commit to universal health care and make the big corporations pay their fair share of tax so as to fund: (a) bringing dental health into Medicare and expanding access to dental care to all; (b) unlimited mental health care under Medicare; and (c) a tripling of the bulk-billing incentive and the establishment of at least six free local health care clinics in each electorate to enable all Australians to go to the GP for free. Back in 2013, I was living in the United States in Florida, working for a little company called Disney. I had an experience there that really set me up for getting into politics for the rest of my life. I'd never really been that interested in politics growing up. I'm not from a political family per se. But one day I walked into the stockroom at where I was working and one of my co-workers was on the floor in literal tears. Obviously, as any normal person would do, I went up to her and asked: 'What's wrong? What's happened?' She was having to make the decision about whether she paid her rent or paid for her insulin. I remember in that moment thinking: 'I don't understand how this has happened. I don't understand how we can be working for this giant billion- or trillion-dollar company, getting paid $7 an hour, and you've been put in this position where you have to dec…
date: 2024-11-18T11:01:00+00:00

Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024; Second Reading | Bills | House debates
type: item
description: I second the amendment and reserve my right to speak.
encoded: I second the amendment and reserve my right to speak.
date: 2024-11-07T11:18:00+00:00